if neither of those complain, then you've probably at least eliminated the most likely potential ugly future surprise. or even try loading it back onto the camera (after using exiftool again to restore original model name). It might be interesting to at least do a quick check of one of the exiftool-modified files with the Olympus software. The most likely danger using general exif modification tools on RAW files is that the changes to binary offsets might make them unusable in some software, most likely the manufacturers own (but also anything else with very specific low-level ideas about what the file should look like) Doing it this way rather than using exiftool will preserve all the binary offsets intact (and is 1:1 reversible if you ever need to). and not in a warm, fuzzy way.īeing comfortable with hex editing, you could, as yet another alternative, create an automated way of performing the same precise surgery on the ORFs rather than the software binary (although you seem to be getting away with that approach). I don't believe that option exists for Adobe - if ACR doesn't recognize the model, it won't let you open the file.Ĭlick to expand.Takes me back to Win98 days. The advantage over EXIFTool is the ORFs don't need to be modified manually, they'll import directly no problem.Īlias em1convert='exiftool -P -Model=E-M1MarkII -overwrite_original' When you relaunch Lightroom, it may warn that the program has been modified (indeed it has).This assumes you don't also have an Olympus SH-1 that you're important RAWs from). (The second change is necessary because otherwise you've changed the length of that code segment and the program will segfault. Change the string 'E-M1MarkII' to 'E-M1MarkIII' and immediately following it change 'SH-1' to 'SH1'.Open /Applications/Adobe\ Lightroom/Adobe\ Lightroom.app/Contents/Frameworks/CameraRaw.lrtoolkit/CameraRaw in your favorite hex edit (I used Hex Fiend).The only downside is you won't be able to import E-M1.2 files any more (for the same reason): No guarantees, but here's what seems to have worked for me (on a Mac - Windows will be slightly different). I found an alternative to to EXIFTool though: modifying Lightroom. Worth using for a special photo now and again, but not as part of standard workflow. It's definitely an option, but TIF is incredibly space-inefficient, and Workspace (last I tried it) was rather slow and unpleasant.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |